VLA Arena

Every vision language action model, side by side

Parameters, GPU memory, inference latency, licence and what each model actually scored in simulation, on real hardware and after fine tuning. Every value links to the paper, model card or repository it came from. Nothing here is estimated unless it says so.

  • 85 models
  • 57 with open weights
  • 32 developers
  • 332 sourced results

The table

Sort by any column, filter by category, licence or whether this platform can train the model for you. GPU memory is the weights only footprint at bf16 computed from the parameter count, unless a published figure exists, in which case that one is shown and marked as reported.

Showing 85 of 85 models. Every number links to the source on the model page. Values from different benchmark suites are not comparable, so sort inside one column rather than across columns.

  • ACE
    ACE-Brain-0.5
    ACE-Brain, July 2026
    Parameters
    8.8 B
    GPU memory
    16 GB weights, 24 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    see model card
    Simulation
    98.2% LIBERO
    Real world
    86.3% MindCube
  • Gemini Robotics 2
    Google DeepMind, July 2026
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    not published
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
    Real world
    92% Multi-finger dexterity (Google DeepMind internal)
  • Gemini Robotics ER 2
    Google DeepMind, July 2026
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    not published
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
  • Gemini Robotics On-Device 2
    Google DeepMind, July 2026
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    not published
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
  • RBY
    LingBot-VLA 2.0
    Robbyant, July 2026
    Parameters
    6 B
    GPU memory
    11 GB weights, 16 GB card
    Latency
    130 ms
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
    Simulation
    93.52% RoboTwin 2.0
    Real world
    66.2% GM-100
  • AI2
    MolmoAct2
    Allen Institute for AI, May 2026
    Parameters
    5.5 B
    GPU memory
    10 GB weights, 16 GB card
    Latency
    180 ms
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
    Simulation
    100% LIBERO
    Real world
    44.3% RoboEval
  • AI2
    MolmoAct2-Think
    Allen Institute for AI, May 2026
    Parameters
    5.5 B
    GPU memory
    10 GB weights, 16 GB card
    Latency
    790 ms
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
    Simulation
    98.8% LIBERO
  • XSR
    Wall-OSS-0.5
    X Square Robot, May 2026
    Parameters
    4 B
    GPU memory
    7.5 GB weights, 12 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
    Simulation
    96.5% LIBERO
    Real world
    61.1% Real robot, 15-task suite (Wall-OSS-0.5 report)
  • Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
    Google DeepMind, April 2026
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    not published
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
    Real world
    93% Instrument reading (Google DeepMind internal)
  • GEN
    GEN-1
    Generalist AI, April 2026
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    not published
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
    Real world
    99% Generalist AI internal real-robot evaluation
  • AGI
    GO-2 (Genie Operator-2)
    AgiBot, April 2026
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    not published
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
    Simulation
    98.5% LIBERO
  • NVIDIA Isaac GR00T N1.7
    NVIDIA, April 2026
    Parameters
    3.1 B
    GPU memory
    16 GB reported
    Latency
    27.9 ms
    Weights
    NVIDIA Open Model
    Simulation
    98.45% LIBERO
    Trainable here
  • π
    π0.7
    Physical Intelligence, April 2026
    Parameters
    5 B
    GPU memory
    9.3 GB weights, 16 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
  • Cosmos Policy
    NVIDIA, January 2026
    Parameters
    2 B
    GPU memory
    6.8 GB reported
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    Code Apache-2.0
    Simulation
    98.5% LIBERO
  • FIG
    Helix 02
    Figure AI, January 2026
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    not published
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
  • RBY
    LingBot-VLA
    Robbyant, January 2026
    Parameters
    4 B
    GPU memory
    7.5 GB weights, 12 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
    Simulation
    88.56% RoboTwin 2.0
    Real world
    35.41% GM-100
  • UNI
    UnifoLM-VLA-0
    Unitree, January 2026
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    not published
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    CC BY-NC-SA
    Simulation
    100% LIBERO
  • NVIDIA Isaac GR00T N1.6
    NVIDIA, December 2025
    Parameters
    3.3 B
    GPU memory
    6.1 GB weights, 12 GB card
    Latency
    44 ms
    Weights
    NVIDIA OneWay NC
    Simulation
    98.45% LIBERO
  • SUT
    NORA-1.5
    SUTD, November 2025
    Parameters
    4 B
    GPU memory
    7.5 GB weights, 12 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    MIT
    Simulation
    95% LIBERO
  • RynnVLA-002
    Alibaba, November 2025
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    not published
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
    Simulation
    97.4% LIBERO
    Real world
    50% Real robot (LeRobot SO100)
  • π
    π*0.6
    Physical Intelligence, November 2025
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    not published
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
    Real world
    90% Physical Intelligence real-robot RECAP evaluation
  • SAI
    InternVLA-M1
    Shanghai AI Laboratory, October 2025
    Parameters
    4.1 B
    GPU memory
    12 GB reported
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    Code MIT
    Simulation
    95.9% LIBERO
  • THU
    X-VLA-0.9B
    Tsinghua University, October 2025
    Parameters
    880 M
    GPU memory
    1.6 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
    Simulation
    98.1% LIBERO
  • Gemini Robotics 1.5
    Google DeepMind, September 2025
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    not published
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
  • Gemini Robotics-ER 1.5
    Google DeepMind, September 2025
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    not published
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
  • THU
    RDT2-FM
    Tsinghua University, September 2025
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    16 GB reported
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
  • THU
    RDT2-VQ
    Tsinghua University, September 2025
    Parameters
    8.3 B
    GPU memory
    16 GB reported
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
  • XSR
    WALL-OSS (flow)
    X Square Robot, September 2025
    Parameters
    4 B
    GPU memory
    7.5 GB weights, 12 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
  • XSR
    WALL-OSS-FAST
    X Square Robot, September 2025
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    not published
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
  • AI2
    MolmoAct-7B-D
    Allen Institute for AI, August 2025
    Parameters
    8.1 B
    GPU memory
    15 GB weights, 24 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
    Simulation
    95.4% LIBERO
  • AI2
    MolmoAct-7B-O
    Allen Institute for AI, August 2025
    Parameters
    7.7 B
    GPU memory
    14 GB weights, 24 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
  • RynnVLA-001
    Alibaba, August 2025
    Parameters
    7 B
    GPU memory
    13 GB weights, 24 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
    Real world
    91.7% Real robot (LeRobot SO-100)
  • GR-3
    ByteDance, July 2025
    Parameters
    4 B
    GPU memory
    7.5 GB weights, 12 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
    Real world
    97.5% Real robot (ByteMini), table bussing (long-horizon)
  • villa-X
    Microsoft, July 2025
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    not published
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
    Simulation
    90.1% LIBERO
  • CAS
    BitVLA
    Chinese Academy of Sciences, June 2025
    Parameters
    3 B
    GPU memory
    1.4 GB reported
    Latency
    73 ms
    Weights
    MIT
    Simulation
    99% LIBERO
  • Gemini Robotics On-Device
    Google DeepMind, June 2025
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    not published
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
  • SmolVLA
    Hugging Face, June 2025
    Parameters
    450 M
    GPU memory
    0.8 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
    Simulation
    87.3% LIBERO
    Real world
    78.3% SO-100 real robot
    Trainable here
  • Parameters
    8.5 B
    GPU memory
    16 GB weights, 24 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
    Simulation
    95.5% LIBERO
  • MID
    ChatVLA-2
    Midea Group, May 2025
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    not published
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
  • NVIDIA Isaac GR00T N1.5
    NVIDIA, May 2025
    Parameters
    2.7 B
    GPU memory
    5.1 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    NVIDIA OneWay NC
    Simulation
    47.5% RoboCasa
    Real world
    93.3% Real GR-1 humanoid manipulation, language following
    Trainable here
  • ODL
    Parameters
    7.5 B
    GPU memory
    14 GB weights, 24 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
    Simulation
    95.2% LIBERO
    Real world
    75% Real robot (UniVLA paper setup)
  • SUT
    NORA
    SUTD, April 2025
    Parameters
    3 B
    GPU memory
    8.3 GB reported
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    MIT
    Simulation
    87.9% LIBERO
    Real world
    56.7% Real-world WidowX (authors' setup)
  • π
    π0.5
    Physical Intelligence, April 2025
    Parameters
    3.6 B
    GPU memory
    8 GB reported
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
    Simulation
    98.8% LIBERO
    Trainable here
  • Gemini Robotics
    Google DeepMind, March 2025
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    not published
    Latency
    250 ms
    Weights
    closed
    Real world
    100% Gemini Robotics dexterous long-horizon specialist tasks
  • Gemini Robotics-ER
    Google DeepMind, March 2025
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    not published
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
    Simulation
    65% ALOHA 2 sim task suite
    Real world
    65% ALOHA 2 real robot
  • AGI
    GO-1 (Genie Operator-1)
    AgiBot, March 2025
    Parameters
    3 B
    GPU memory
    5.6 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    CC BY-NC-SA
    Real world
    60% Real robot (complex long-horizon and dexterous tasks)
  • NVIDIA Isaac GR00T N1
    NVIDIA, March 2025
    Parameters
    2.2 B
    GPU memory
    4.1 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    63.9 ms
    Weights
    NVIDIA OneWay NC
    Simulation
    66.5% DexMimicGen (DexMG)
    Real world
    76.8% Real-world GR-1 humanoid evaluation
  • MID
    ChatVLA
    Midea Group, February 2025
    Parameters
    3.4 B
    GPU memory
    6.3 GB weights, 12 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    MIT
    Real world
    51.4% Real robot (authors' setup)
  • MID
    DexVLA
    Midea Group, February 2025
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    not published
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
    Simulation
    99.1% LIBERO
  • FIG
    Helix
    Figure AI, February 2025
    Parameters
    7.1 B
    GPU memory
    13 GB weights, 24 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
    Real world
    95% Figure internal logistics evaluation (parcel induction)
  • Magma-8B
    Microsoft, February 2025
    Parameters
    8.9 B
    GPU memory
    17 GB reported
    Latency
    1100 ms
    Weights
    MIT
    Simulation
    52.3% SimplerEnv
    Real world
    67.3% AITW
  • SU
    OpenVLA-OFT
    Stanford University, February 2025
    Parameters
    7.5 B
    GPU memory
    14 GB weights, 24 GB card
    Latency
    72.9 ms
    Weights
    MIT
    Simulation
    97.1% LIBERO
  • SAI
    SpatialVLA
    Shanghai AI Laboratory, January 2025
    Parameters
    3.5 B
    GPU memory
    8.5 GB reported
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    MIT
    Simulation
    78.1% LIBERO
  • π
    π0-FAST
    Physical Intelligence, January 2025
    Parameters
    3 B
    GPU memory
    8 GB reported
    Latency
    750 ms
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
  • HKU
    Moto (Moto-GPT)
    HKU, December 2024
    Parameters
    98 M
    GPU memory
    0.2 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
    Simulation
    74% SimplerEnv
    Real world
    60% Real-world (authors' own three-task suite)
  • SAI
    Seer
    Shanghai AI Laboratory, December 2024
    Parameters
    316 M
    GPU memory
    0.6 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
    Simulation
    87.7% LIBERO
    Real world
    78.4% Real-world (authors' own four-task suite)
  • SAI
    Seer-Large
    Shanghai AI Laboratory, December 2024
    Parameters
    566 M
    GPU memory
    1.1 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
  • CogACT-Base
    Microsoft, November 2024
    Parameters
    7.6 B
    GPU memory
    30 GB reported
    Latency
    181 ms
    Weights
    MIT
    Simulation
    74.8% SIMPLER
    Real world
    71.2% Real robot (Realman arm)
  • CogACT-Large
    Microsoft, November 2024
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    30 GB reported
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    MIT
    Simulation
    76.7% SIMPLER
  • CogACT-Small
    Microsoft, November 2024
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    30 GB reported
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    MIT
    Simulation
    73.3% SIMPLER
  • GR-2
    ByteDance, October 2024
    Parameters
    230 M
    GPU memory
    0.4 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
    Real world
    97.7% Real robot, multi-task (ByteDance platform)
  • KST
    Parameters
    7 B
    GPU memory
    13 GB weights, 24 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    MIT
    Simulation
    62% Language Table (simulation)
    Real world
    50.1% Real-world tabletop manipulation (Franka Emika Panda)
  • THU
    RDT-170M
    Tsinghua University, October 2024
    Parameters
    170 M
    GPU memory
    0.3 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    MIT
  • THU
    RDT-1B
    Tsinghua University, October 2024
    Parameters
    1.2 B
    GPU memory
    2.2 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    MIT
    Real world
    100% Real robot (Mobile ALOHA, RDT paper protocol)
  • π
    π0 (pi-zero)
    Physical Intelligence, October 2024
    Parameters
    3.3 B
    GPU memory
    8 GB reported
    Latency
    73 ms
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
  • MIT
    HPT-Base
    MIT, September 2024
    Parameters
    13 M
    GPU memory
    0 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    MIT
    Real world
    70% Real-world (authors' own setup)
  • MIT
    HPT-Large
    MIT, September 2024
    Parameters
    51 M
    GPU memory
    0.1 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    MIT
  • MIT
    HPT-Small
    MIT, September 2024
    Parameters
    3 M
    GPU memory
    0 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    MIT
  • MIT
    HPT-XLarge
    MIT, September 2024
    Parameters
    227 M
    GPU memory
    0.4 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    MIT
    Real world
    76.7% Real-world (authors' own setup)
  • MID
    TinyVLA
    Midea Group, September 2024
    Parameters
    1.3 B
    GPU memory
    2.4 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    14 ms
    Weights
    MIT
    Simulation
    77.6% Meta-World
    Real world
    94% Real-world Franka (authors' setup)
  • UCB
    CrossFormer
    UC Berkeley, August 2024
    Parameters
    130 M
    GPU memory
    0.2 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    MIT
    Real world
    95% CrossFormer real-robot evaluation (paper Table 3)
  • UCB
    Embodied Chain-of-Thought (ECoT)
    UC Berkeley, July 2024
    Parameters
    7.2 B
    GPU memory
    13 GB weights, 24 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    MIT
    Real world
    72% ECoT accelerated inference study
  • SU
    OpenVLA
    Stanford University, June 2024
    Parameters
    7.5 B
    GPU memory
    16.8 GB reported
    Latency
    239.6 ms
    Weights
    MIT
    Simulation
    76.5% LIBERO
    Real world
    85% Google robot (real RT-1 mobile manipulator)
  • PKU
    RoboMamba
    Peking University, June 2024
    Parameters
    3.2 B
    GPU memory
    6 GB weights, 12 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
    Simulation
    63% SAPIEN manipulation
  • UCB
    Octo-Base
    UC Berkeley, May 2024
    Parameters
    93 M
    GPU memory
    0.2 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    MIT
    Simulation
    75.1% LIBERO
    Real world
    72% Octo real-robot finetuning suite (paper Table I)
  • UCB
    Octo-Small
    UC Berkeley, May 2024
    Parameters
    27 M
    GPU memory
    0.1 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    MIT
  • UMA
    3D-VLA
    UMass Amherst, March 2024
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    not published
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
    Simulation
    68% RLBench
  • OXE
    RT-1-X
    Open X-Embodiment, October 2023
    Parameters
    not published
    GPU memory
    not published
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
    Real world
    50% Open X-Embodiment cross-lab evaluation
  • OXE
    RT-2-X
    Open X-Embodiment, October 2023
    Parameters
    55 B
    GPU memory
    102 GB weights
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
  • RT-2
    Google DeepMind, July 2023
    Parameters
    55 B
    GPU memory
    102 GB weights
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
    Simulation
    90% Language-Table (simulation)
  • RoboCat
    Google DeepMind, June 2023
    Parameters
    1.2 B
    GPU memory
    2.2 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
  • SU
    ACT (Action Chunking with Transformers)
    Stanford University, April 2023
    Parameters
    80 M
    GPU memory
    0.1 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    10 ms
    Weights
    MIT
    Simulation
    86% ALOHA simulation (MuJoCo)
    Real world
    96% Real ALOHA hardware
    Trainable here
  • CU
    Parameters
    278 M
    GPU memory
    0.5 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    100 ms
    Weights
    MIT
    Simulation
    93% Robomimic
  • Parameters
    31 M
    GPU memory
    0.1 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    closed
    Simulation
    90% Robomimic
  • RT-1
    Google, December 2022
    Parameters
    35 M
    GPU memory
    0.1 GB weights, 8 GB card
    Latency
    not published
    Weights
    Apache-2.0
    Real world
    97% RT-1 real-robot evaluation

Three different questions

A model that wins a simulation suite is not automatically the model that works on your bench, and neither of those tells you what happens after you fine tune it on fifty of your own episodes. The arena keeps the three apart on purpose.

Simulation

Reproducible benchmark suites. Everyone runs the same episodes, so the numbers can be compared inside a suite.

  1. 1AI2
    MolmoAct2
    LIBERO, Object
    100%
  2. 2UNI
    UnifoLM-VLA-0
    LIBERO, Object
    100%
  3. 3MID
    DexVLA
    LIBERO, Object
    99.1%
  4. 4CAS
    BitVLA
    LIBERO, object
    99%
  5. 5AI2
    MolmoAct2-Think
    LIBERO, Spatial
    98.8%
  6. 6π
    π0.5
    LIBERO, Spatial, fine-tuned checkpoint at 30k steps
    98.8%

Real world

Rollouts on physical hardware. The setups differ, so read these as evidence, not as a ranking.

  1. 1
    Gemini Robotics
    Gemini Robotics dexterous long-horizon specialist tasks, full long-horizon lunch-box packing
    100%
  2. 2THU
    RDT-1B
    Real robot (Mobile ALOHA, RDT paper protocol), Pour Water-L-1/3, instruction following (correct amount poured)
    100%
  3. 3GEN
    GEN-1
    Generalist AI internal real-robot evaluation, aggregate over the reported tasks, about 1 hour of robot data per task
    99%
  4. 4
    GR-2
    Real robot, multi-task (ByteDance platform), 105 manipulation tasks, simple setting
    97.7%
  5. 5
    GR-3
    Real robot (ByteMini), table bussing (long-horizon), instruction following
    97.5%
  6. 6
    RT-1
    RT-1 real-robot evaluation, seen tasks, over 700 instructions
    97%

Fine tuned tasks

What the model reaches after being adapted to a new task or a new robot, usually from a small number of demonstrations. This is the number that matters if you bring your own data.

  1. 1THU
    RDT-1B
    Real robot (Mobile ALOHA, RDT paper protocol), Handover, 5-shot few-shot learning
    100%
  2. 2
    NVIDIA Isaac GR00T N1.5
    Unitree G1 post-training, Place one of two fruits or objects, 1000 demonstrations
    98.8%
  3. 3AI2
    MolmoAct2
    Real-world zero-shot (Franka DROID setup), 5 tasks, 15 trials per task, no per-task fine-tuning
    87.1%
  4. 4
    RoboCat
    RoboCat fine-tuning with 1000 demonstrations, KUKA lifting
    86%
  5. 5π
    π0.7
    Physical Intelligence real-robot evaluation, Zero-shot cross-embodiment shirt folding on bimanual UR5e, no UR5e laundry data in training
    85.6%
  6. 6UCB
    Octo-Small
    Octo ablation suite (real WidowX), 40 trials across two language-conditioned and two goal-conditioned tasks
    83%

These lists rank the best value each model reports on that axis, and the suite is printed next to it. A model at the top of the simulation list is not necessarily better than the one below it if the two ran different suites. Models that also report embodied reasoning benchmarks carry those on their own page, kept separate because no robot moves in them.

What practitioners say

Benchmarks measure what the authors chose to measure. The community rating is the other half: one vote per AY-Robots account, on any model, changeable at any time. Open a model page to cast yours.

No votes yet. If you have run any of these models on real hardware, you are exactly the person whose rating is worth something here. Create an account and open any model page.

Five kinds of model

The label VLA is used loosely. These groups separate what the models actually do, which matters more for your decision than the year they came out.

Foundation VLA

39 models

Large models pretrained on multi robot corpora, meant to be fine tuned rather than trained from scratch.

Gemini Robotics 2
Google DeepMind, July 2026
not published, closed weights
RBY
LingBot-VLA 2.0
Robbyant, July 2026
6 B, Apache-2.0
XSR
Wall-OSS-0.5
X Square Robot, May 2026
4 B, Apache-2.0
GEN
GEN-1
Generalist AI, April 2026
not published, closed weights
π
π0.7
Physical Intelligence, April 2026
5 B, closed weights
FIG
Helix 02
Figure AI, January 2026
not published, closed weights
RBY
LingBot-VLA
Robbyant, January 2026
4 B, Apache-2.0
UNI
UnifoLM-VLA-0
Unitree, January 2026
not published, CC BY-NC-SA
SAI
InternVLA-M1
Shanghai AI Laboratory, October 2025
4.1 B, Code MIT
THU
X-VLA-0.9B
Tsinghua University, October 2025
880 M, Apache-2.0
Gemini Robotics 1.5
Google DeepMind, September 2025
not published, closed weights
THU
RDT2-FM
Tsinghua University, September 2025
not published, Apache-2.0
THU
RDT2-VQ
Tsinghua University, September 2025
8.3 B, Apache-2.0
XSR
WALL-OSS (flow)
X Square Robot, September 2025
4 B, Apache-2.0
XSR
WALL-OSS-FAST
X Square Robot, September 2025
not published, Apache-2.0
RynnVLA-001
Alibaba, August 2025
7 B, Apache-2.0
GR-3
ByteDance, July 2025
4 B, closed weights
villa-X
Microsoft, July 2025
not published, closed weights
BAI
UniVLA (Unified Vision-Language-Action Model, BAAI)
BAAI, June 2025
8.5 B, Apache-2.0
NVIDIA Isaac GR00T N1.5
NVIDIA, May 2025
2.7 B, NVIDIA OneWay NC
ODL
UniVLA (task-centric latent actions)
OpenDriveLab, May 2025
7.5 B, Apache-2.0
π
π0.5
Physical Intelligence, April 2025
3.6 B, Apache-2.0
Gemini Robotics
Google DeepMind, March 2025
not published, closed weights
AGI
GO-1 (Genie Operator-1)
AgiBot, March 2025
3 B, CC BY-NC-SA
NVIDIA Isaac GR00T N1
NVIDIA, March 2025
2.2 B, NVIDIA OneWay NC
FIG
Helix
Figure AI, February 2025
7.1 B, closed weights
Magma-8B
Microsoft, February 2025
8.9 B, MIT
SU
OpenVLA-OFT
Stanford University, February 2025
7.5 B, MIT
SAI
SpatialVLA
Shanghai AI Laboratory, January 2025
3.5 B, MIT
π
π0-FAST
Physical Intelligence, January 2025
3 B, Apache-2.0
CogACT-Base
Microsoft, November 2024
7.6 B, MIT
CogACT-Large
Microsoft, November 2024
not published, MIT
CogACT-Small
Microsoft, November 2024
not published, MIT
KST
LAPA (Latent Action Pretraining)
KAIST, October 2024
7 B, MIT
THU
RDT-1B
Tsinghua University, October 2024
1.2 B, MIT
π
π0 (pi-zero)
Physical Intelligence, October 2024
3.3 B, Apache-2.0
SU
OpenVLA
Stanford University, June 2024
7.5 B, MIT
OXE
RT-2-X
Open X-Embodiment, October 2023
55 B, closed weights
RT-2
Google DeepMind, July 2023
55 B, closed weights

Reasoning VLA

17 models

Models that emit an intermediate plan, a subtask or a chain of thought before they emit actions.

Action policy

15 models

Policies without language conditioning. They learn one task from your demonstrations and are the baseline every VLA has to beat.

5 of these run on your own arm from here

Record a dataset with an SO-100 class arm, pick a model, and the training pool rents the GPU by the hour. For those models the platform pages carry measured numbers from that pool rather than published ones: real defaults, real GPU tier, real inference latency.

SO-100 robot arm, the reference hardware of the AY-Robots platform
An SO-100, the reference arm of this platform. Roughly 110 to 150 euro in parts, six Feetech STS3215 servos at 7.4 V.

How this list is built

A comparison table is only worth reading if you know where its numbers came from. Four rules, applied to every row.

Every number carries its source

Parameter counts, licences, latencies and benchmark results are taken from the paper, the model card or the official repository of the model in question, and the link sits next to the value. Nothing here is inferred from a similar model.

Missing is missing

Most publications do not report inference latency or GPU memory. Those fields stay empty instead of being filled with a plausible guess. An empty cell is a correct answer, an invented one is not.

Computed values are labelled

The only numbers the arena produces itself are the weights only memory footprint at a given precision and the smallest real GPU that fits it. Both are derived from the parameter count with a stated formula, and both are labelled as computed wherever they appear.

Comparison stays inside a suite

Results are grouped into simulation, real world and fine tuned tasks, and each value keeps its suite and split. Two models are only directly comparable when they report the same suite on the same split.

Last editorial update 2026-08-11. Company names and logos are the trademarks of their owners and appear here only to identify who published which model.

Questions

What is a vision language action model?
A vision language action model, usually shortened to VLA, takes camera images and a task written in plain language and outputs robot actions, normally joint positions or end effector deltas. The vision and language part is typically a pretrained vision language model, and an action head converts its representation into continuous commands. The point of the design is that a single policy can follow instructions it was never explicitly trained on, instead of one policy per task.
Why does the arena not rank models with one overall score?
Because the numbers come from different benchmark suites, and a LIBERO success rate and a real robot success rate do not measure the same thing. Averaging them would produce a number that looks authoritative and means nothing. The arena therefore sorts inside a column, always shows which suite a value came from, and links every value to the source it was taken from.
How much GPU memory does a VLA need?
Most papers do not publish a memory figure, so the arena computes the weights only footprint from the parameter count at bf16 precision and marks it as computed. Weights are a lower bound: activations, the image encoder intermediates, the KV cache and the CUDA context come on top, which in practice is roughly 30 to 50 percent more for inference. Fine tuning is a different order of magnitude again, because optimiser state and gradients usually cost several times the weights unless you use LoRA or a similar adapter.
Which of these models can I actually train on AY-Robots?
Five of them: GR00T N1.7, GR00T N1.5, Pi0.5, SmolVLA and ACT. Those are the models the training pool can fine tune on a LeRobot dataset that you record with your own arm, and the platform pages for them carry the real defaults, GPU tier and measured inference latency from that pool. Every other model in the arena is listed for comparison and links to its own repository.
What does the community rating mean?
It is a one to five rating from people with an AY-Robots account, one vote per account and per model, changeable at any time. It is a subjective signal about how a model behaved in practice, not a benchmark. Read it next to the measured numbers, not instead of them.
How current is this list?
Every entry carries its own editorial date and the sources it was built from. The field moves fast, so a model can gain a new checkpoint or a new licence between updates. Where a source contradicts what you read here, trust the source and tell us, the link is on every model page.

Drive a real arm before you pick a model

A physical SO-100 is online and free to control in the browser. No signup, no client, no hardware of your own.